>>188711
I have evidence that everyone drinks water dies, eventually. What's your point?
Limitations and Why It's Not "Fact"
The Complexity of Sexual Orientation:
Sexual orientation is influenced by a mix of biological, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. The FBO effect accounts for only 15โ29% of male homosexuality, so it is one piece of a larger puzzle.
Correlation vs. Causation:
While the maternal immune hypothesis is compelling, definitive causation has not been proven. Direct evidence (e.g., measuring these antibodies in mothers and linking them to outcomes in offspring) is still relatively limited.
Variation in Outcomes:
Not all men with older brothers are gay, and not all gay men have older brothers. This highlights that the FBO effect is a contributing factor, not a universal explanation.
Scientific Theories Evolve:
Like all scientific theories, this one is subject to refinement or revision as new evidence emerges. It is not static or absolute.
Current Consensus
The FBO effect and the maternal immune response hypothesis are widely regarded as valid and significant contributions to understanding sexual orientation.
It is considered scientific theory, meaning it is supported by a substantial body of evidence and offers a plausible explanation, but it is not a proven, universal "fact."
Further research is needed to solidify the biochemical mechanisms, measure maternal immune responses more directly, and explore how these factors interact with other influences on sexual orientation.
In summary, the study is credible and highly regarded in its field, but it represents one important piece of an ongoing scientific investigation into the complex factors that shape sexual orientation.