>>149331
it is progression, just one you don't like
but since you lumped it into all "change is good, progress is good"
you might want to back track a bit on that then, because unironically old people are the most averse to that
like i said, you are lumping together many things which should be separate
the original argument was for "decision making"
fix you mix technological progress with social progress, they are not the same, and as I pointed out, the human experience is largely unchanged, and people with vast experience on that have value to be considered
later you lumped it together with "change/progress is always good", when pointed the lgbt case you go "well not that one"
then finally you made an argument about job performance as well, which was not the point at all, originally
the point was:
>who is better qualified to make decisions?
me and the other anon argued it's better to leave it to older, wiser and also smarter (wise and smart) people, for the best outcome